Friday, September 16, 2011
Mining for visual nuggets in what’s commonly overlooked.
It’s a struggle to capture something I haven’t seen before, something that’s more skillfully executed than what I have in mind at a given moment. Also, an instructor advised, if you are drawing a blank in terms of inspiration, go out and shoot anyway. Our recent fire season ruined the atmosphere, obliterating what we would normally see during a favorite time of year, late summer and early fall. This series, for now called “Worried Climate” needs a lot of work to offer the kind of originality that I have in mind, but here’s a start.
Monday, August 29, 2011
Photo-manipulation of Natural Phenomena
Making Sad Warnings Permanent
To continue my December 27, 2010 post, a showing of my “Relics” is scheduled for December 2011 at a local gallery (Frame Shop and Gallery, Hamilton, Montana). But the effects need more work. Blacks blocked up. Lighter areas looked bleached. Earlier this summer, I plunged into an intensive digital photography upgrade to get a better handle on the editing software, Photoshop (Rocky Mountain School of Photography, Missoula, Montana). Now I can understand the problems evident in my “Relics” series.
While in the program, I took every opportunity to manipulate an image in Photoshop, specifically to duplicate, flip, and blend a single image – which works better than trying to blend several different images. In one class, the instructor asked us to think in terms of a concept and produce a series based on that concept.
Mine: commemorative roadside crosses disintegrate and are forgotten. I wanted to conjure up a way to make these sad warnings permanent. As four-way symmetry is a metaphor for eternity, from each photograph I took of a roadside cross, I designed a square made up of four blended layers, each lying at a different 90-degree angle.
Scarves can be permanent, handed down from one generation to the next. I converted the above square into a silk scarf, and it looks just fine.
Please don’t drink and drive.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
The Otherworldly in Macro
I love the effects of some extreme close-up views and decided to give Macro a try. From last June through the early fall, 2010, I conducted Macro tests. My equipment: Canon EOS 20D with a Canon Macro lens EF 100 mm 1:2.8 IS, using a remote shutter release, mounted on a Slik AMT tripod
The closer you are to a subject, the shallower the depth of field. To try to “fix” that, I used Photoshop, version CS4. I took multiple shots of the same subject, each shot with a different focus point. For each shot I created a separate layer, selected all layers, auto-aligned, and auto-blended them.
Essential help came from iStock contributor Kevin Jay on the site’s photography forum. I learned:
The best light is bright and even; avoid direct sunlight. I shot indoors, placing the subject in front of a window and away from direct sunlight. Sometimes I used a light box under the subject, or a swatch of black velvet; or I painted the subject with a flashlight.
F 16 is the smallest aperture you can use and still get sharp focus. Lock up the camera’s mirror for exposure times slower than 1/60 of a second. When mounted on a tripod, the camera does not need its image stabilizer. If you leave it on when using a tripod, the result can be soft images as the lens spins and fights against a still platform.
Except for the single Macro photograph seen here, each resulting image had something wrong: a blemish on a petal, overexposure, underexposure, blurriness, flat and dull lighting, unintended see-through effects, and/or poor color balance. The worst was posterization in a few images, which can be corrected by shooting and processing in Raw. Raw has more color flexibility than JPEG. I haven’t gotten to Raw yet.
From the beginning, I asked, “What can I do with Macro that I don’t see anyone else doing?” I like to capture what looks like an otherworldly environment. Come spring when the flowers bloom again I’ll give Macro another try.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)